Wilfong v. Norfolk Dredging Company
Plaintiff: Norman Wilfong, III
Defendant: Norfolk Dredging Company
Case Number: 1:2011cv03766
Filed: December 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Cecil
Presiding Judge: Marvin J. Garbis
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46:688
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 10 Motion of Defendant to Transfer Venue to the Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 4/25/2012. (bf2, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilfong v. Norfolk Dredging Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norman Wilfong, III
Represented By: Andrew V Buchsbaum
Represented By: Bernard Douglas Friedman
Represented By: John Paton James
Represented By: James D Skeen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Dredging Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?