Allegis Group, Inc. et al v. Jordan et al
Plaintiff: Allegis Group, Inc., Aerotek, Inc. and Teksystems, Inc.
Defendant: Justin Jordan, Daniel Curran, Ana Neto Rodrigues, Alexander Ferrello, Michael Nicholas and Chris Hadley
Case Number: 1:2012cv02535
Filed: August 23, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Anne Arundel
Presiding Judge: James K. Bredar
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 150 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Defendants' 149 Corrected Motion to Stay Enforcement Pending Appeal and Approve Supersedeas Bond as set forth; denying as moot 148 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 5/14/2019. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/em finance, USCA 5/14/19-das)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 147 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Jordan, Curran, Hadley, and Nicholas' 141 Motion to Stay Enforcement Pending Appeal and Approve Supersedeas Bond. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 11/5/2018. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
March 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entering JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiffs Aerotek, Inc., Allegis Group, Inc., Teksystems, Inc. against Defendants Daniel Curran, Justin Jordan, Michael Nicholas; granting Plaintffs' 124 Fourth Motion for Summary Judgment; setting deadline for remaining parties to file a joint status report. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 3/8/2018. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 118 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER vacating in part 107 Memorandum Opinion and 108 Order to the extent that the Court denied Allegis rescission and restitution; denying as moot without prejudice Plaintiff's 109 Third Motion for Summary Judgment; deny ing as moot without prejudice Defendants' 114 Motion for Leave to File Surreply; setting deadline parties shall stipulate to a briefing schedule, consistent with the dictates of Local Rule 105.2(a), on whether Allegis has met the requirements for rescission and restitution. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 3/6/2017. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
March 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 107 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 3/18/2016. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
June 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 6/10/14. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
April 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 4/17/13. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allegis Group, Inc. et al v. Jordan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allegis Group, Inc.
Represented By: Steven E Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aerotek, Inc.
Represented By: Steven E Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teksystems, Inc.
Represented By: Steven E Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Jordan
Represented By: David Barmak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Curran
Represented By: David Barmak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ana Neto Rodrigues
Represented By: David Barmak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexander Ferrello
Represented By: David Barmak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Nicholas
Represented By: David Barmak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Hadley
Represented By: David Barmak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?