Ficep Corporation v. Voortman USA Corp
Ficep Corporation |
Voortman USA Corp |
1:2013cv00429 |
February 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Harford |
William D Quarles |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 85 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Ficep Corporation; DENYING 80 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Voortman USA Corp.; DIRECTING Voortman may, by 2/20/17, file a motion for partial summary judgment with regard to direct infringement by customers other than Haas Metal and Quality; DIRECTING Ficep to arrange a case planning telephone conference by 2/24/17. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 2/3/2017. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 143 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS granting 127 Motion for Order to Show Cause Why It Should Not Be Held in Contempt. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 1/4/2017. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 3/24/2015. (ca2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 7/15/14. (apls, Deputy Clerk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.