Edwards v. Waste Management of Maryland, Inc.
Defendant:
Waste Management of Maryland, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sean Edwards
Case Number:
1:2013cv01145
Filed:
April 18, 2013
Court:
Maryland District Court
Office:
Baltimore Office
County:
88888
Presiding Judge:
Richard D Bennett
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:
42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edwards v. Waste Management of Maryland, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Waste Management of Maryland, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence P Postol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sean Edwards | |
| Represented By: | Alan Lescht(Designation Retained) |
| Represented By: | Constance Elizabeth Travanty |
| Represented By: | Rani Vanessa Rolston(Designation Retained) |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.