M-Edge International Corporation v. LifeWorks Technology Group LLC
| M-Edge International Corporation |
| LifeWorks Technology Group LLC |
| LifeWorks Technology Group LLC |
| M-Edge International Corporation |
| 1:2014cv03627 |
| November 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Anne Arundel |
| William D Quarles |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 112 Defendant Lifeworks' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Renewed Motion to Strike Portions of the Malguarnera Expert Report; directing Plaintiff to arrange a telephone conference regarding the scheduling of further proceedings and trial. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 3/8/2017. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 105 Motion for Reconsideration and/or to Preclude Plaintiff from Pursuing Claims of Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 8/29/2016. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 87 Motion to Strike ; denying 88 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 8/1/2016. (ca2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Patent Claim Construction. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 2/16/2016. (nd2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
