McCrea v. Johns Hopkins Universities et al
| Nicole Rena McCrea |
| Johns Hopkins Universities, Dexter Smith and Eileen Haase |
| 1:2015cv00579 |
| February 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Baltimore City |
| William D Quarles |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 10/24/2016. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)(C/M 10/24/16)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 61 Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal and Stay of Court Order; finding as moot 62 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; finding as moot 63 Motion to Amend Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 8/11/2016. (c/m 8/11/16 ca2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 40 Motion to Quash; denying 41 Motion to Quash; denying 42 Motion to Quash; denying 43 Motion to Quash; granting 47 Motion to Produce; denying as moot 48 Motion to Quash; denying 49 Motion to Quash; denying as moot 50 Motion to Quash; denying 54 Motion to Modify the Defendants' Subpoena to the District of Columbia Human Resources. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 7/27/2016. (c/m 7/27/2016 ca2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 12/17/2015. (c/m 12/17/15 ca2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
