Drury v. Dziwanowski et al
| Edwin Drury |
| P. Dziwanowski, W. Hicks and Anne Arundel County, Maryland |
| 1:2015cv03845 |
| December 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Anne Arundel |
| Marvin J. Garbis |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants P. Dziwanowski and W. Hick' 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Defendants partial summary judgment; dismissing counts IV malicious prosecution claims and V conspiracy claims; dismissing any "summary punishment" and any denial of medical treatment § 1983 claims; directing the case shall proceed on count I Battery, Count II False Arrest, Count III False Imprisonment and State and Federal Constitutional Claims set forth; setting date for Plaintiff to arrange a telephone conference to address trial scheduling. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 3/24/2017. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying P. Dziwanowski's 18 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 8/29/2016. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Defendant Anne Arundel County, Maryland's 3 Motion to Dismiss; denying Defendants' 12 Motion to Bifurcate; setting telephone conference. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 3/15/2016. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
