Veney v. Fine et al
Lemoyne Veney |
Tamera Lynn Fine, Mark Walter Crooks, Manisha Garner, Brendan Hurson and Robert Spelke |
1:2015cv03965 |
December 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
88888 |
Richard D Bennett |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MANDATE of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Lemoyne Veney (nd2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 15 JUDGMENT of USCA (certified copy)"AFFIRMING" the judgment of the District Court as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Lemoyne Veney. (sls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 14 ORDER of USCA granting Motion for leave to proceed PRLA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Lemoyne Veney (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 13 RETURN PLEADING ORDER. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 1/28/2016. (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Pleading)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 RETURN PLEADING ORDER. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 1/28/2016. (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Pleading)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 RETURN PLEADING ORDER. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 1/28/2016. (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Pleading)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 Correspondence from Plaintiff re: Request for Docket Sheet. (krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 USCA Case Number 16-6070 for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Lemoyne Veney. Case Manager - Karen Stump (sls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 RETURN PLEADING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard D Bennett on 1/20/2016. (Attachments: #1 First page of returned pleading) (c/m 1/21/16)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #6 Notice of Appeal. IMPORTANT NOTICE: To access forms which you are required to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit please go to http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov and click on Forms & Notices. (sls, Deputy Clerk) |
Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to Fourth Circuit -- Initial (sls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order Dismissing Case, #3 Memorandum Opinion by Lemoyne Veney. (Fee Status: Filing Not Paid) (sls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Correspondence from Plaintiff. (krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Dismissing this case; Closing case. Signed by Judge Richard D Bennett on 1/8/2016. (c/m 1/8/16)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard D Bennett on 1/8/2016. (c/m 1/8/16)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lemoyne Veney (Attachments: #1 Account Transactions - Commissary)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Walter Crooks, Tamera Lynn Fine, Manisha Garner, Brendan Hurson, Robert Spelke, filed by Lemoyne Veney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit of Truth by Lemoyne Veney, #3 Notice of Demand to Affirm or Refute Sworn Affidavit as to Tamara Fine, #4 Notice of Demand to Affirm or Refute Sworn Affidavit as to Mark Crooks, #5 Notice of Demand to Affirm or Refute Sworn Affidavit as to Manisha Garner, #6 Notice of Demand to Affirm or Refute Sworn Affidavit as to Brendan Hurson, #7 Notice of Demand to Affirm or Refute Sworn Affidavit as to Robert Spelke, #8 Notice of Demand to Affirm or Refute Sworn Affidavit as to Richard Bennett, #9 Envelope)(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.