Tidwell v. IMPAQ International LLC
Plaintiff: Miguel D. Tidwell
Defendant: IMPAQ International LLC
Case Number: 1:2016cv00421
Filed: February 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Howard
Presiding Judge: Richard D Bennett
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 1/12/2017. (c/m 1/12/17 bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 12 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 12/29/2016. (c/m 12/29/16 bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tidwell v. IMPAQ International LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel D. Tidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IMPAQ International LLC
Represented By: Charles R Bacharach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?