McNulty et al v. Casero et al
John S. McNulty and Carolyn McNulty |
Robert A. Casero, Jr. and Catherine Mary Hattenburg |
1:2016cv02426 |
June 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Harford |
J. Frederick Motz |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2409 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 192 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 8/14/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 179 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 6/24/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 175 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 6/9/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 167 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 81 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 5/22/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 165 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 77 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Strike Expert William C. Harvey II and Thomas E. Farcht, Jr.s Opinions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 5/20/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 147 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 2/25/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 145 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 80 Motion to Strike Defendants' Expert Designations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 2/7/2020. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 10/24/2019. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.