Byrnes v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Leo R Byrnes
Defendant: Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv02445
Filed: June 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Frederick
Presiding Judge: George Levi Russell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying Plaintiiff's 2 Motion to Stay; closing case. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 2/22/2017. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Byrnes v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leo R Byrnes
Represented By: Ramsay M Whitworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Represented By: Malcom Carter DeLorme
Represented By: Haley A Wojdowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?