Dibazar v. Quintana
Plaintiff: Arash Dibazar
Defendant: Alexander Rose Quintana
Case Number: 1:2017cv00237
Filed: January 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: George Levi Russell
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 9 MOTION to Vacate 6 Clerk's Entry of Default, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ; denying as moot 10 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment; VACATING 5 Clerks Entry of Default. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 9/28/2017. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 9.29.17)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dibazar v. Quintana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arash Dibazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexander Rose Quintana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?