Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Certificate Number OME11989 v. Chesapeake Building Supply, LLC
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Certificate Number OME11989 |
Chesapeake Building Supply, LLC |
1:2017cv00327 |
February 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
99999 |
George Levi Russell |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Certificate Number OME11989 v. Chesapeake Building Supply, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Certificate Number OME11989 | |
Represented By: | Diane Elizabeth Moir |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Allan Wothers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Chesapeake Building Supply, LLC | |
Represented By: | Andrew Janquitto |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.