Constantini v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lydia Constantini
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv01982
Filed: July 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 325 MEMORANDUM Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 10/16/2019. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(cags, Deputy Clerk)
July 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-19) by MDL Panel TRANSFERRING CASE to the District of Maryland. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Constantini v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lydia Constantini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?