People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant: Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc., Animal Park, Care & Rescue, Inc. and Robert L. Candy
Case Number: 1:2017cv02148
Filed: July 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Allegany
Presiding Judge: Marvin J. Garbis
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 16 U.S.C. ยง 1531
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 235 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 3/2/2022. (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 218 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 10/29/2020. (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
December 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 182 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 12/26/2019. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 138 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 7/8/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 12/3/2018. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 11/1/2018. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie A Gallagher on 7/23/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 25 Motion for Disqualification of Presiding Judge. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 2/27/2018. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
January 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 15 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 1/16/2018. (hep, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Represented By: Justin R Cochran
Represented By: Marcos E Hasbun
Represented By: Conor Brendan O Croinin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Animal Park, Care & Rescue, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert L. Candy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?