Miller v. Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Plaintiff: Thomas Miller
Defendant: Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Case Number: 1:2017cv02349
Filed: August 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Carroll
Presiding Judge: George Levi Russell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 8/16/2021. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 9/26/2018. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Miller
Represented By: Leizer Zalman Goldsmith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?