Simpson et al v. Pure Technologies U.S., Inc.
| Cody Simpson, Nicholas Redding and Brian Miles |
| Pure Technologies U.S., Inc. |
| 1:2017cv02532 |
| August 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Carroll |
| J. Frederick Motz |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 11 Motion for Conditional Certification to Facilitate Identification and Notice to Similarly Situated Employees, directing parties to submit a joint proposal no later than July 13th, 2018. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 6/21/2018. (bus, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 20 Joint Motion for Judgment for Plaintiff Cody Simpson; Judgment is entered for Cody Simpson against Pure Technologies U.S., Inc., in the amounts of $13,966.32 in wages, $13,966.32 in liquidated damages, and $10,000.00 in attorneys fees and costs. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 5/8/2018. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing the parties to supplement the motion with documentation supporting the requested award of $10,000 attorneys fees to Plaintiff Cody Simpson's Counsel within 14 days. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 4/18/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
