Smith v. State of Maryland et al
Alton W. Smith |
State of Maryland, Baltimore City Community College, Tonja L. Ringgold, Enyinnaya Iweha and Cynthia Webb |
1:2017cv03051 |
October 18, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Baltimore City |
Marvin J. Garbis |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 63 Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 1/10/2020. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 9/9/2019. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER advising parties may not re-litigate the substantive legitimacy of Plaintiff's termination in further proceedings before this Court; and absent any modification requests by the parties, this Court's prior Scheduling Order remains in effect. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 7/25/2018. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment; denying 21 Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 26 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Supplement Their Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment; and directing Plaintiff to arrange a case-planning telephone conference. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 4/4/2018. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.