Godwin v. Piepszak et al
Paul Godwin |
Jennifer Piepszak and Chase Card |
1:2017cv03575 |
December 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Anne Arundel |
James K. Bredar |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss; closing case. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 7/9/2018. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 7/10/18-das) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing Clerk shall amend 13 Amended Complaint to be reflected as a Supplemental Complaint; terminating Jennifer Piepszak as a party in the case; setting deadline for Plaintiff to file UNDER SEAL a copy of his Experian cred it report and to mail a copy to counsel for Defendant Chase Bank at address therein; directing Defendant shall treat Plaintiff's credit report as confidential; setting deadline for Defendant to file response to complaint and supplemental complaint. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 4/10/2018. (c/m 4/11/18-das)(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Chase Bank's 9 Motion for More Definite Statement; setting deadline for Plaintiff to file amended complaint as directed; directing clerk shall amend docket to reflect the correct name of the corporate entity sued is Chase Bank USA, N.A. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 2/20/2018. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 2/21/18-das) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.