Braxton et al v. Jackson et al
| Maurlanna Braxton, Stephanie Gamble and Brittany Scott |
| Kenneth Jackson, William Sheppard, Jane Doe and Dione Rodman |
| 1:2018cv01946 |
| June 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Baltimore City |
| Deborah K. Chasanow |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 74 motion to vacate dismissal (c/m to Plaintiff Scott and to Defendants 11/14/22 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 11/14/2022. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m and c/e/m to Defendants Kenneth Jackson and Dionne Rodman on 8/4/21 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 8/4/2021. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m and c/e/m to Defendants Jackson and Rodman on 11/24/20 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 11/24/2020. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 4/21/2020. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Defendants Jackson and Rodman 9/20/19 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 9/20/2019. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM and ORDER DENYING 8 motion to permit pre-scheduling conference discovery. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 10/3/2018. (sat, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
