Clayton v. Fairnak et al
| Cavin Clayton |
| Gregory T Fairnak, Enterprise SI Corp. dba Healthcare MDM Inc. and Healthcare MDM, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv02134 |
| July 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Baltimore County |
| James K Bredar |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Enterprise SI Corp. dba Healthcare MDM Inc., Gregory T Fairnak (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tsimpedes, Athanasios) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Maryland, case number 03-C-18-003881. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7441525), filed by Gregory T Fairnak, Enterprise SI Corp. dba Healthcare MDM Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment State Court Complaint, #3 Attachment Summons State Court, #4 Attachment State Court Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Ex. A,(ELECTRONICALLY FILED IN ERROR #6 Exhibit Ex B Declaration of Gregory Fairnak), #7 Exhibit Ex C- Enterprise dba Healthcare MDM Inc., #8 Exhibit Ex D - Enterprise SI Corp AOI, #9 Exhibit Ex. E- State Court Notice of Removal)(Tsimpedes, Athanasios) Modified on 7/16/2018 (slss, Deputy Clerk). |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge James K. Bredar. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
