Acosta v. Loving Care Services, Inc. et al
| Department Of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta |
| Loving Care Services, Inc. and Bernadette Nwanguma |
| 1:2018cv02427 |
| August 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Baltimore County |
| Deborah K Chasanow |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bernadette Nwanguma.(Turner, Aaron) |
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #4 consent motion for extension of time. Defendant Bernadette Nwanguma's response to Plaintiff's complaint is now due by September 26, 2018. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 9/17/2018. (Chasanow, Deborah)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time by Bernadette Nwanguma (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Turner, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron J Turner on behalf of Bernadette Nwanguma (Turner, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Loving Care Services, Inc., Bernadette Nwanguma. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(bus, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Department Of Labor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons for Loving Care Services, Inc., #4 Summons for Bernadette Nwanguma)(Sinesi, Dominique) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
