Brown-Wicks v. PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC
Ariel Brown-Wicks |
PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC |
1:2018cv02576 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Jarrod Hazel |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC identifying Corporate Parent PPE Casino Resorts Maryland Developer, LLC, Other Affiliate Maryland Live Holdings, LLC for PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC.(Amelung, Courtney) |
Filing 10 QC NOTICE re: #9 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement filed by PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC was filed incorrectly. ***Please re-file the document by selecting Other Filings Other Documents Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement, and then enter corporate parent/affiliate(s) when prompted. The document has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 [FILED IN ERROR] Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC (Amelung, Courtney) Modified on 10/12/2018 (tds, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint in Part by PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Amelung, Courtney) |
Filing 7 Defendant's Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint by PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Amelung, Courtney) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Courtney Blair Amelung on behalf of PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC (Amelung, Courtney) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Fiona W Ong on behalf of PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC (Ong, Fiona) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen D Shawe on behalf of PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC (Shawe, Stephen) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION for Extension of Time by PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC(Ong, Fiona) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC.(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Case reassigned to Judge George Jarrod Hazel. Judge Roger W Titus no longer assigned to the case. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7513284.), filed by Ariel Brown-Wicks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Greenberg, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown-Wicks v. PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PPE Casino Resorts Maryland, LLC | |
Represented By: | Courtney Blair Amelung |
Represented By: | Stephen D Shawe |
Represented By: | Fiona W Ong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ariel Brown-Wicks | |
Represented By: | Jeremy Greenberg |
Represented By: | Denise M Clark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.