Naffis et al v. ACS Education Services et al
| Parvis Naffis and Vicky Naffis |
| US Department of Education, Xerox Education Solutions, LLC, The Dept of Educ Nelnet on behalf of, Xerox Education Services, LLC, ACS Education Services and NelNet, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv02738 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER DENYING #1 Motion to Withdraw the Reference for Trial of the Adversary Proceeding. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 10/19/2018. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Withdraw Reference by Parvis Naffis (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Third Amended Complaint, #3 Opposition on behalf of Xerox Educations Solutions, #4 Exhibit Plaintiffs Request for Jury Trial, #5 Exhibit Statement of Defendant, #6 Exhibit Joint Order Scheduling Pretrial Proceedings and Trial, #7 Exhibit Proceeding Memo, #8 Exhibit Bankruptcy Court Docket Sheet, #9 Exhibit Answer of Defendant Xerox Education Services, LLC, #10 Exhibit Order Denying Plaintiff Motion to Withdraw The Reference for Trial of Adversary Proceeding, #11 Response on behalf of Naffis, #12 Transmittal)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
