MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Webb et al
MTGLQ Investors, L.P. |
Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Penny A Webb, Sucessors of Randy Webb, Randy M. Webb, Penny A. Webb and Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service |
1:2018cv02859 |
September 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Deborah K Chasanow |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Penny A. Webb (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Document) (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 13 Correspondence from Clerk to The Circuit Court for St. Mary's County regarding remanding case. (c/m 10/18/2018 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting #11 Motion to Remand to State Court, case to be REMANDED to The Circuit Court for St. Mary's County Maryland. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 10/18/2018. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff, MTGLQ Investors, L.P., and by Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(White, Neil) |
Filing 10 QC NOTICE: #9 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement filed by MTGLQ Investors, L.P. was filed incorrectly. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. **When docketing the Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement the Corporate Parents, Affiliates and parties with a financial interest MUST be entered when prompted by CM/ECF to do so. Please re-file the document correctly. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Telephone Conference held with counsel representing Plaintiff and the government on 9/25/2018 before Judge Deborah K. Chasanow. (sat, Chambers) |
Filing 9 (FILED IN ERROR) Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by MTGLQ Investors, L.P. (Tussey, Sara) Modified on 9/25/2018 (heps, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 8 RESPONSE re #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal (Corrected - Replaces ECF No. 7) filed by Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service.(White, Neil) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE re #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service.(White, Neil) |
Filing 6 PAPERLESS NOTICE SCHEDULING a telephone conference with counsel on Tuesday, September 25, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. Chambers will initiate the conference call. (sat, Chambers) |
Filing 5 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 9/17/2018. (c/m 9/17/18 km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #3 consent motion for extension of time. The government's response to Plaintiff's complaint is now due by October 22, 2018 (c/e/m to T. Hawes 9/14/18 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 9/14/2018. (Chasanow, Deborah) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time by Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(White, Neil) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5(White, Neil) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for St. Mary's County, case number C-18-CV-18-00315., filed by Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Amended Complaint, #4 Civil Case Information Report, #5 Complaint Exhibit A, #6 Complaint Exhibit B, #7 Complaint Exhibit C, #8 Complaint Exhibit D, #9 Complaint Exhibit E, #10 Complaint Exhibit F, #11 Complaint Exhibit G, #12 Complaint Exhibit H, #13 Complaint Exhibit I, #14 Complaint, #15 State Court Line)(White, Neil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.