Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC v. City of Salisbury, Maryland
| Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC |
| City of Salisbury, Maryland |
| 1:2018cv03246 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment by City of Salisbury, Maryland (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support thereof, #2 Attachment List of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit N, #17 Exhibit O, #18 Exhibit P, #19 Exhibit Q, #20 Exhibit R)(Cornbrooks, Ernest) |
Filing 7
Marginal ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. City of Salisbury, Maryland answer extended through and including 12/3/2018. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/16/2018. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Respond by City of Salisbury, Maryland(Cornbrooks, Ernest) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC. City of Salisbury, Maryland served on 10/22/2018, answer due 11/13/2018.(Friedberg, Jeremy) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC (Friedberg, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to City of Salisbury, Maryland.(hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE: [1-2] Disclosure of Corporate Interest attached to #1 Complaint filed by Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC was filed incorrectly. **Please refile the disclosure as a separate entry under the "Other Documents" category and select the "Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement" event. The disclosure has been marked FILED IN ERROR, and the link has been disabled. In addition, the complaint and exhibits were scanned into a single PDF. For future reference, each document must be scanned individually into separate PDF documents. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7624258.), filed by Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 (FILED IN ERROR) Disclosure of Corporate Interest, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Friedberg, Jeremy) Modified on 10/19/2018 (hmls, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC v. City of Salisbury, Maryland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Salisbury, Maryland | |
| Represented By: | Ernest I Cornbrooks, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Insight at Parson's Lake, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy S Friedberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
