James v. Warden
| Phillip James |
| Warden, Andrew Moltrie and Patuxent Institute Medical Staff |
| 1:2018cv03449 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing the complaint without prejudice; clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 1/2/2019. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-01-02-2019)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting the plaintiff 21 days to file an updated Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis using pre-printed forms used by non-prisoners. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/27/2018. (c/m 11/28/18 bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Warden(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Phillip James (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER Granting Plaintiff 28 days from the date of this Order to file a Supplement to the Complaint and to either pay the filing fee or to file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/9/2018. (c/m 11/09/2018 bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Warden, filed by Phillip James. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
