Harris v. Esper
Plaintiff: NAPOLEON HARRIS
Defendant: Mark T. Esper
Case Number: 1:2018cv03562
Filed: November 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: James K Bredar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Mark T. Esper, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(ko, Deputy Clerk)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark T. Esper ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7681352.), filed by NAPOLEON HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Agency, #3 Summons US Attorney General, #4 Summons US Attorney MD)(Rolston, Rani)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Esper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark T. Esper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NAPOLEON HARRIS
Represented By: Rani Vanessa Rolston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?