Doe #7 et al v. Prince George's County Board of Education et al
| Jane Doe, 11 and John Doe, 7 |
| Deonte Carraway, Prince George's County Board of Education and Michelle Williams |
| 1:2018cv03689 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Prince George's County Board of Education regrading service to counsel for Michelle Williams (Scott, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Prince George's County Board of Education identifying Other Affiliate Prince George's County Risk Management Fund for Prince George's County Board of Education.(Scott, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Prince George's County, Maryland, case number CAL18-39692. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7702391), filed by Prince George's County Board of Education. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Writ of Summons Prince George's County Board of Education, #3 Exhibit State Court Writ of Summons Michelle Williams, #4 Exhibit State Court Civil Information Sheet, #5 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #6 Exhibit State Court Line, #7 Exhibit State Court Entry of Appearance)(Scott, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
