Jackson-El v. Dovey et al
| Michael Jackson-El |
| Brian E. Frosh and Richard Dovey |
| 1:2018cv03899 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting Petition 28 days to provide further information regarding his entitlement to equitable tolling of the one-year statute of limitation. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 1/22/2019. (c/m 1/22/19 bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Brian E. Frosh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record)(DiMiceli, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Correspondence from Plaintiff Jackson-El re: Right to file a belated Motion for Reconsideration (Attachments: #1 Attachment Letter From State of Maryland Public Defender)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew DiMiceli on behalf of Brian E. Frosh (DiMiceli, Andrew) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Directing Respondents to file within 30 days a limited response. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 12/19/2018. (c/m 12/19/18 bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Jackson-El(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Jackson-El.(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
