Marcano v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners
Anthony J. Marcano |
Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners |
1:2019cv00229 |
January 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Catherine C Blake |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Local Rule 103.5(a) (Attachments: #1 Attachment Copy of Complaint filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, #2 Attachment Copy of Civil Non--Domestic Case Information Report filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, #3 Attachment Copy of Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City)(Banton, Tamal) |
Filing 12 QC NOTICE: #11 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement, filed by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners was filed incorrectly..**Please refile using the correct event> Other Filings> Other Documents> Local Rule. Do not use Local Rule 103.3. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 (FILED IN ERROR)Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners (Attachments: #1 Attachment Copy of Complaint filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, #2 Attachment Copy of Civil Non--Domestic Case Information Report filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, #3 Attachment Copy of Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City)(Banton, Tamal) Modified on 3/14/2019 (kw2s, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 10 (FILED IN ERROR)Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners (Attachments: #1 Attachment Copies of Original Pleadings from the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Case No. 24-C-18-006868))(Banton, Tamal) Modified on 3/13/2019 (kw2s, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 9 QC NOTICE: #8 Notice (Other), filed by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners was filed incorrectly.**Please refile using the correct event> Other Filings> Other Documents> Local Rule. A certification 103.5 disclosure should be the main document. Each additional attachment should be filed as a separate attachment and labeled. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 (FILED IN ERROR)NOTICE by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners Filing Original Copies of Circuit Court Pleadings (Attachments: #1 Attachment Copies of Original Pleadings from the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Case No. 24-C-18-006868))(Banton, Tamal) Modified on 3/12/2019 (kw2s, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 7 MOTION to Seal Exhibits A-E & G attached to his Opposition (ECF Doc. No.: 6) by Anthony J. Marcano (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sadri, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 -SEALED-RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claimor in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Anthony J. Marcano. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Proposed Order, #11 List of Exhibits, #12 Affidavit)(Sadri, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claimor in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of BCBSC's Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - November 2014 Letter, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Jerome Jones, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 (EEOC Notifications to BCBSC))(Banton, Tamal) |
Filing 4 MARGINAL ORDER granting #2 BCBSC's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/6/2019. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Anthony J. Marcano.(Sadri, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners(Banton, Tamal) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Baltimore City, case number 24-C-18-6868. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 14637112389) filed by Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Case Information Report, #4 Summons, #5 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Marcano v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners | |
Represented By: | Tamal Ajani Banton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Anthony J. Marcano | |
Represented By: | Paul V Bennett |
Represented By: | Jeffrey J Sadri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.