Blackstone International, Ltd. v. Design Center International, Ltd. et al
Blackstone International, Ltd. |
Home Star International Ltd. and Design Center International, Ltd. |
1:2019cv00291 |
January 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Levi Russell |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Matthew A. Lafferman (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7812192.) by Blackstone International, Ltd.(Ruthenberg, Kirk) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Nicholas H. Jackson (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7812189.) by Blackstone International, Ltd.(Ruthenberg, Kirk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Design Center International, Ltd. and Home Star International Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Blackstone International, Ltd. (Ruthenberg, Kirk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Design Center International, Ltd., Home Star International Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7811620.), filed by Blackstone International, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Ruthenberg, Kirk) |
Case Reassigned to Judge George Levi Russell, III. Judge Deborah K. Chasanow no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.