Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Goden et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Innis Goden, Elite Lounge LLC and Kenrick Goden |
| 1:2019cv00457 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Correspondence mailed to the register of copyrights. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued 21 days as to Elite Lounge LLC, Innis Goden, Kenrick Goden. (Attachments: #1 Summons 2, #2 Summons 3)(hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. re #1 Complaint, Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding Copyright (Lonstein, Julie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. re #1 Complaint, Statement of Current Address (Lonstein, Julie) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. (Lonstein, Julie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elite Lounge LLC, Innis Goden, Kenrick Goden ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7843332.), filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Defendant, Kenrick Goden, #3 Summons as to Defendant, Innis Goden, #4 Summons as to Defendant, Elite Lounge LLC)(Lonstein, Julie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
