Flowers v. Naiman et al
Plaintiff: Rahsheda Flowers
Defendant: Baltax 2017, LLC, Aaron Naiman and Naiman & Naiman, P.A.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00618
Filed: February 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: James K Bredar
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' responses due 5/26/19. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 4/26/2019. (vdcs, Chambers)
April 26, 2019 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Aaron Naiman, Naiman & Naiman, P.A.(Flint, Justin)
April 26, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Michael Flint on behalf of Aaron Naiman, Naiman & Naiman, P.A. (Flint, Justin)
April 26, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Michael Flint on behalf of Aaron Naiman, Naiman & Naiman, P.A. (Flint, Justin)
April 22, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rahsheda Flowers. All Defendants.(Carney, Benjamin)
April 22, 2019 Filing 7 [FILED IN ERROR - wrong event, atty to refile] AFFIDAVIT of Service by Rahsheda Flowers(Eckroad, Kirsten) Modified on 4/22/2019 (krs, Deputy Clerk).
February 27, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Howard Carney on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Carney, Benjamin)
February 27, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Martin Eugene Wolf on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wolf, Martin)
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Baltax 2017, LLC, Aaron Naiman, Naiman & Naiman, P.A..(jb5, Deputy Clerk)
February 27, 2019 Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Rahsheda Flowers (Eckroad, Kirsten)
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 Supplemental to #1 Complaint filed by Rahsheda Flowers Proposed Summonses for Defendants (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Eckroad, Kirsten)
February 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7860128.), filed by Rahsheda Flowers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Eckroad, Kirsten)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flowers v. Naiman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baltax 2017, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Naiman
Represented By: Justin Michael Flint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Naiman & Naiman, P.A.
Represented By: Justin Michael Flint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rahsheda Flowers
Represented By: Kirsten Eckroad
Represented By: Benjamin Howard Carney
Represented By: Martin Eugene Wolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?