United States of America v. Dvorsky et al
United States of America |
Comptroller of Maryland and Regis Dvorsky |
1:2019cv00821 |
March 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Ellen L Hollander |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MARGINAL ORDER Approving #7 Status Report filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 5/28/2019. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 STATUS REPORT by United States of America(Kumar, Nishant) |
Filing 6 ORDER asking the government, as plaintiff, to file a status report advising the Court of its position concerning a stay pending the resolution of Dvorsky's bankruptcy proceeding. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 4/10/2019. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Comptroller of Maryland.(Stephens, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to Regis Dvorsky by Regis Dvorsky(Fisher, Morgan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan William Fisher on behalf of Regis Dvorsky (Fisher, Morgan) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Comptroller of Maryland, Regis Dvorsky.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Comptroller of Maryland, Regis Dvorsky, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kumar, Nishant) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.