Joyce v. Absolute Consulting, Inc. et al
Michael Joyce |
Absolute Consulting, Inc. and GSE Systems, Inc. |
1:2019cv00868 |
March 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Richard D Bennett |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by GSE Systems, Inc..(Decker, Suzzanne) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Michael Joyce. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Jones, Taylor) |
Filing 15 ORDER withdrawing #14 Scheduling Order - filed in error. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 5/30/2019. |
Filing 14 FILED IN ERROR - SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 10/15/2019. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 5/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Informal Discovery Letter)(krs, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 5/30/2019 (cags, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Sfekas on behalf of All Defendants (Sfekas, Lindsay) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Kaye Baron on behalf of All Defendants (Baron, Stephanie) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Absolute Consulting, Inc..(Decker, Suzzanne) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by GSE Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Decker, Suzzanne) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael Joyce. Absolute Consulting, Inc. waiver sent on 3/29/2019, answer due 5/28/2019; GSE Systems, Inc. waiver sent on 3/29/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Waiver of Service - GSE)(Jones, Taylor) |
Filing 8 [FILED IN ERROR per atty] SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Joyce. Absolute Consulting, Inc. served on 3/26/2019, answer due 4/16/2019.(Jones, Taylor) Modified on 4/2/2019 (krs, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Andrew W Dunlap. Directing attorney Andrew W Dunlap to use the attorney's existing CM/ECF login and password previously issued in this Court. The account password can be reset at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-password-reset. Signed by Clerk on 3/29/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of William R Liles. Directing attorney William R Liles to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 3/29/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Michael Joyce of Filing Notice of Consent (Jones, Taylor) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Andrew W. Dunlap (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7914816.) by Michael Joyce(Jones, Taylor) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for William R. Liles (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7914789.) by Michael Joyce(Jones, Taylor) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Absolute Consulting, Inc., GSE Systems, Inc..(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Absolute Consulting, Inc., GSE Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7909454.), filed by Michael Joyce. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Absolute Consulting, Inc., #4 Summons GSE Systems, Inc.)(Jones, Taylor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.