Design Center International, Ltd. et al v. Blackstone International, Ltd. et al
| Home Star International, Ltd. and Design Center International, Ltd. |
| Blackstone International, Ltd., William Heintzelman, John Black and ECW Advisors, LLC |
| 1:2019cv00956 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| James K Bredar |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Home Star International, Ltd. identifying Other Affiliate Design Center International, Ltd. for Home Star International, Ltd..(Gamper, Charles) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Design Center International, Ltd. identifying Other Affiliate Home Star International, Ltd. for Design Center International, Ltd..(Gamper, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7922394.), filed by Design Center International, Ltd., Home Star International, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request for Summons for Blackstone, #3 Summons Request for Summons for Black, #4 Summons Request for Summons for ECW, #5 Summons Request for Summons for ECW (Resident Agent), #6 Summons Request for Summons for Heintzelman)(Gamper, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
