U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Inc. Greyhound Lines and Greyhound Lines, Inc. |
1:2019cv01651 |
June 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Ellen L Hollander |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MARGINAL ORDER approving #6 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/8/2019. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of Withdrawal of Counsel Jess Unger (Salacuse, Maria) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Greyhound Lines, Inc. waiver sent on 6/4/2019, answer due 8/5/2019.(Unger, Jess) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Eunju Park on behalf of Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Park, Eunju) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ethan Daniel Balsam on behalf of Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Balsam, Ethan) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Greyhound Lines, Inc. c/o The Corporation Trust, Inc., 2405 York Road #201, Lutherville-Timonium MD 21093 on 06/04/2019 by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Waiver of Service due by 7/4/2019.(Unger, Jess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Inc. Greyhound Lines, filed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Unger, Jess) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.