Ervin v. Corizon Health et al
Roger Ervin |
Matthew Carpenter, Corizon Health, Holly Pierce, Jeff Nines, Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and Assistant Director William Beeman |
1:2019cv01666 |
June 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Ellen L Hollander |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Correspondence from Plaintiff Ervin re: Medical Malpractice Case (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Affidavit)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roger Ervin(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Jury Trial Demand on All Defendants Motion for Stay of Proceedings or Alternatively for an Extension of time for Filing Additional Evidence and or for Filing of Opposition by Roger Ervin (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 ORDER requesting that Plaintiff pay the 400 dollar filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 6/7/2019. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-06-10-2019) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Roger Ervin(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Beeman, Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Matthew Carpenter, Corizon Health, Jeff Nines, Holly Pierce, filed by Roger Ervin. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.