Washington v. Gelsinger
Petitioner: Keith A Washington
Respondent: Warden Denise Gelsinger
Case Number: 1:2019cv01696
Filed: June 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 By A Person In State Custody ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0416-8060702.), filed by Keith A Washington. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Of Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Ginsburg, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Gelsinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Keith A Washington
Represented By: Daniel Harry Ginsburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Denise Gelsinger
Represented By: Edward John Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?