Byrd v. Ta Chen Interational et al
Vance Byrd |
Bill Gall, Ta Chen Interational, Asher Wolf and Johnny Hsieh |
1:2019cv01873 |
June 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Deborah K Chasanow |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Second Supplemental to #1 Complaint filed by Vance Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Supplemental to #1 Complaint filed by Vance Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Bill Gall, Johnny Hsieh and Asher Wolf.(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) cm on 7/15/2019 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 14637116547 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion of Plaintiff for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Granting Plaintiff 21 days from the date of this Order to pay the full civil filing fee of $400 and to submit completed summons forms for Defendants Ta ChenInternational, Johnny Hsieh, and Bill Gall. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 6/26/2019. (c/m 6/27/19 as directed jnls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vance Byrd(ds3, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bill Gall, Johnny Hsieh, Ta Chen Interational, Asher Wolf, filed by Vance Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Right to Sue Letter, #4 Attachment)(ds3, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.