Bartz v. NASA Federal Credit Union et al
Jeffrey Bartz |
Equifax Information Services, LLC and NASA Federal Credit Union |
1:2019cv02278 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Richard D Bennett |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MARGINAL ORDER granting #6 Notice of Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Jeffrey Bartz. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 10/1/2019. (krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jeffrey Bartz (Williams, Kevin) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Equifax Information Services LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 8/30/2019. (krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Adler, Nathan) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Equifax Information Services, LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Adler, Nathan) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Jeffrey Bartz.(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for FCRA violations against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8166039.), filed by Jeffrey Bartz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Williams, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.