Shankle v. Saul
| Angela Shankle |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 1:2019cv02849 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Richard D Bennett |
| J Mark Coulson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 11/6/2019. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Shea, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
| PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Vickie LeDuc on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 2
Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 9/27/2019. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8261524.), filed by Angela Shankle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Shea, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
