Garcia v. Baltimore City Police Department
| Luis Garcia |
| Baltimore City Police and Baltimore City Police Department |
| 1:2019cv02905 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 QC NOTICE: 5 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge filed by attorney for Luis Garcia was filed incorrectly. **Filed on behalf of party Jasmin Rowlett in wrong case. The correct case is 1:19-cv-02896-ADC. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Sperance Conroy on behalf of Baltimore City Police Department (Conroy, Justin) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Baltimore City Police Department. Baltimore City Police Department waiver sent on 10/24/2019, answer due 12/23/2019.(Conroy, Justin) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Baltimore City Police Department. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baltimore City Police Department filed by Luis Garcia. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8271762)(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Lewis, Dionna) Modified on 10/3/2019 (hmls, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
