Hickman v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
| Angie Hickman |
| Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC, CVS, Inc., CVS Corporation, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS/Pharmacy No. 2216 and Maryland CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. |
| 1:2019cv03238 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Joint Status Report and Request for Modification of the Scheduling Order filed by Angie Hickman. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 12/4/2019. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT (Joint) and Request for Modification of the Scheduling Order by Angie Hickman (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Cord, John) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE re #5 Standing Order Concerning Removal Defendants Statement in Response to Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C., Maryland CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C..(HALL, EMELIA) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 4/3/2020. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 11/20/2019. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C., Maryland CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C..(HALL, EMELIA) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 11/12/2019. (ds3, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal by CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C., Maryland CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. (ds3, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS, Inc., CVS/Pharmacy No. 2216, Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C., Maryland CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C., filed by Angie Hickman.(ds3, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3-4) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY. (ds3, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS, Inc., CVS/Pharmacy No. 2216, Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C., Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC identifying Corporate Parent CVS Caremark Corporation for CVS Pharmacy, Inc.; Corporate Parent Caremark for CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C.; Corporate Parent NeighborCare Pharmacy Services for Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C.; Corporate Parent CVS Caremark, Other Affiliate CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC.(HALL, EMELIA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Baltimore County, case number C-03-CV-19-000233. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8339477), filed by CVS Corporation, Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Main Street Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex 1 Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement and Disclosure of Financial Interest, #4 Exhibit Ex 3 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(HALL, EMELIA) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
