The Town of Grantsville, Maryland v. 3M Company et al
The Town of Grantsville, Maryland |
National Foam, Inc., Angus Fire Armour Corp., Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc., 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Tyco Fire Products LP, Ansul Company, Kidde PLC, Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Chemguard, Inc. |
1:2019cv03414 |
November 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Richard D Bennett |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MDL Certified Transfer ORDER. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Remark: Case electronically transferred to the USDC for South Carolina. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by The Town of Grantsville, Maryland was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Proposed Summons. To correct this problem, file Proposed Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Proposed Summons to #1 Complaint. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Deficiency Notice -- The Town of Grantsville, Maryland, Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 12/9/2019 (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8374205.), filed by Town of Grantsville. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Novak, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.