Mattice v. Bell, Warden
Jasaun Robert Lawrence Mattice |
J.R. Bell, Warden |
1:2020cv00187 |
January 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Levi Russell |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jasaun Robert Lawrence Mattice. (Attachments: #1 statement of issue, #2 Envelope)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 14637120816 (jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mattice v. Bell, Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jasaun Robert Lawrence Mattice | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: J.R. Bell, Warden | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.