Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. Penn et al
| Bankers Life and Casualty Company |
| Ariana Sarah Elizabeth Penn and Tracie Ann Hines-McKenzie |
| 1:2020cv00264 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint, filed by Bankers Life and Casualty Company was filed incorrectly. Attachments #9 & #10 must be filed separately as two separate filings. Please refile Notice and Request to Waive Service of Summons as two separate filings. (slss, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Bankers Life and Casualty Company identifying Corporate Parent Conesco Life Insurance Company, Corporate Parent CDOC, Inc., Corporate Parent CNO Financial Group, Inc. for Bankers Life and Casualty Company.(Doud, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Interpleader against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8484669.), filed by Bankers Life and Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G,(ELECTRONICALLY FILED IN ERROR ATTACHMENTS 9 AND 10 #9 Summons, #10 Summons))(Doud, John) Modified on 1/31/2020 (slss, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
