Elliott-Bey v. State of Maryland et al
Andre Jerome Elliott-Bey |
State of Maryland, Richard Dovey, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and Maryland Correctional Training Center (M.C.T.C.) |
1:2020cv00781 |
March 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Catherine C Blake |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER directing Clerk to amend docket to reflect case 20cv781 and 20cv1084 are related; denying Petitioner seeking reconsideration of dismissal in 20cv781 (ECF3). Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 5/1/2020. (c/m 5/1/2020)(ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 5/1/2020. (c/m 5/1/2020)(ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus; Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 3/31/2020. (c/m 3/31/2020) (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 3/31/2020. (c/m 3/31/2020)(ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andre Jerome Elliott-Bey(ds3, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Andre Jerome Elliott-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Attachment #1, #3 Envelope)(ds3, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.