Bradley v. Dentalplans.com
Plaintiff: Deborah Bradley
Defendant: Dentalplans.com
Case Number: 1:2020cv01094
Filed: April 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Catherine C Blake
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Dentalplans.com. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
April 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dentalplans.com ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8629666.), filed by Deborah Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Turnbull, Emanwel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. Dentalplans.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Bradley
Represented By: Emanwel Josef Turnbull
Represented By: Alexander H Burke
Represented By: Peter A Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dentalplans.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?